
How to get a business loan in Dubai
Four things decide a business loan in Dubai, and most declines happen on the last two. What the credit bureau shows, what your bank statements prove, and what to fix before you apply anywhere.
Lending
Discounting and factoring differ on who collects and who knows, not on the law underneath them. What Federal Decree-Law 16 of 2021 changes for a UAE business assigning its invoices, and why applications fail.

Invoice discounting lets a UAE business draw cash against invoices it has already issued, before the customer pays. Factoring does the same thing with one difference that matters commercially and none that matters legally: in factoring your customer is told and usually pays the funder directly, while in discounting the arrangement stays between you and the funder and your customer keeps paying you as normal. Both are governed by the same UAE statute, and both are treated identically by it whether or not the funder can come back to you if your customer never pays.
That statute is the part almost nobody explains, and it decides several things that will otherwise surprise you. This page covers the mechanics, the law, the arithmetic and the reasons applications fail.
You issue an invoice on 60-day terms. Rather than waiting, you assign that invoice to a funder, who advances you a percentage of its value now. Your customer pays on the due date. The funder takes what it advanced plus its charge, and you get the balance.
What gets priced is mostly time and mostly your customer. How long the money will be out, and whether the company that owes it will pay. Behind both sits a quieter question about whether the invoice itself is solid, meaning the work is done, the delivery is signed and nobody is arguing about it.
Notice who is being assessed. In a term loan the lender is mostly reading you. In receivables finance it is reading your customer at least as hard, because your customer is the one who repays it. That is why a small supplier with a large, reliable debtor often gets further here than it would anywhere else in the market.
The commercial differences are real, and they come down to who talks to your customer.
Who collects. Under discounting you keep the collections relationship and chase your own invoices. Under factoring the funder runs collections. If your credit control is a person and a spreadsheet, handing it over has genuine value. If your customer relationships are the business, handing them to a third party is not free.
Who knows. Discounting is usually undisclosed, so your customer has no reason to learn about it. Factoring is disclosed, and the customer is notified and instructed to pay the funder. Some UAE buyers are entirely relaxed about this. Others read it as a supplier under strain, fairly or not, and you know your own buyers better than any funder does.
Who carries the loss if the customer never pays. This is recourse, and it is a contract term rather than a feature of either product. With recourse, the funder can come back to you. Without it, the funder absorbs an approved debtor's default, and charges more for doing so. You can have disclosed factoring with recourse, or undisclosed discounting without it. Do not assume the label tells you the answer. Read the clause.
What the law says about the distinction. Almost nothing, which is the useful part. Federal Decree-Law No. 16 of 2021 on Factoring and Transfer of Receivables (opens in a new tab) applies to the transfer of receivables in commercial and civil transactions "whether involving the right to recourse against the Transferor or not", and says nothing that makes notified transfers a different legal animal from unnotified ones. So the choice between them is a business decision about your customers and your collections, not a legal one.
The law issued on 29 August 2021, was published in Official Gazette 711 on 9 September, and took effect on 8 December 2021. Five of its provisions change what you should do.
A ban on assignment in your customer's contract does not stop you. This is the big one. Article 5(2) says a restriction on the seller's right to transfer its receivables "shall neither take effect nor affect the validity or enforceability of the transfer", and that the funder is not liable for breaching it. Plenty of UAE supply contracts, particularly with large buyers, carry a no-assignment clause, and plenty of finance directors believe that clause ends the conversation. Under this law it does not end the transfer. It may still be a breach between you and your customer, with whatever commercial consequence that carries, so this is a reason to get advice rather than a reason to ignore the clause. It is not, however, the automatic no that people assume.
Registration is what makes it count against everyone else. Between you and your funder the transfer binds as soon as it is signed. Against the rest of the world it only bites once it is registered on the national movables register, under Article 7(2), and Article 8 settles competing claims by the order of registration. The register is operated by Emirates Integrated Registries Company (opens in a new tab). The practical effect: if you assigned the same receivables to somebody else earlier and they registered, they rank ahead, and a funder that finds that registration will stop. Two funders, one receivables book, is a quiet and very common way for an application to die.
Notice decides who your customer can safely pay. Before your customer receives notice of the transfer, paying you discharges the debt (Article 15(1)). After notice, only paying the funder does (Article 15(2)). That is the whole legal difference between disclosed and undisclosed arrangements. One more detail worth knowing: under Article 15(8) a notified customer can ask the funder to prove the transfer within seven business days, and if the funder does not, the customer can pay you and still be discharged.
Your security and your credit insurance travel with the invoice. Article 6 transfers ancillary rights automatically, including security over goods, collateral and credit insurance, with no separate step. If you insure your receivables, that cover moves with the assigned invoice rather than being left behind.
You warrant ownership, not your customer's solvency. Article 10 requires the seller to warrant that it has the right to transfer the receivable and has not already transferred it. The same article then states that the seller does not guarantee the debtor's ability to pay, now or later. So if you are carrying the risk of your customer defaulting, it is because your contract says so, not because the law puts it there.
One boundary to note. Under Article 2(3)(c), rights to payment under documentary credits and letters of guarantee sit outside this law entirely. If your receivable is backed by an LC, you are in a different instrument with different mechanics.
Article 25 is short and worth reading before you sign with anyone: factoring "may only be carried on in the State after a relevant license is obtained from the Central Bank", on terms the Central Bank sets.
So the party that needs the licence is the one putting up the money. Ask who that is. In an arrangement involving a platform, an introducer and a funder, the licensed entity is the funder, and you should be able to see plainly which name is which on your paperwork. GrowthIQ does not provide the capital and is not the licensed party. We are the layer that works out which funders your business fits before you apply to any of them.
Nobody can quote you a figure on a web page, and any page that does is quoting a number invented for the page. What you can do is get the shape of it right, because the shape is what people misread.
There are usually two charges. A discount charge that runs with time, quoted per 30 days on the amount advanced. A service or facility fee, either a percentage of the invoice or a flat amount, which does not run with time. Time-based pricing means a 30-day invoice and a 90-day invoice do not cost the same, and it means the cost lands on how long your customer takes rather than on what you borrowed.
Put your own numbers through it in this order.
Step two is where people go wrong. Average payment terms in the UAE run around a month for most suppliers, with construction stretching further, and the 2026 Atradius payment practices research (opens in a new tab) found collection cycles lengthening, with more UAE companies reporting longer days-sales-outstanding than shorter. Price your facility against what your slowest real customer does, not your invoice terms.
Sector matters too. The 2025 edition (opens in a new tab) broke the UAE down and the spread is wide: in steel and metals, 60% of B2B sales went on credit at terms of around 50 days with 55% of invoices overdue, while FMCG ran terms nearer 40 days with 56% overdue, and pharma sat near 50-day terms with about 60% overdue. If you are in one of the slower-paying sectors, a receivables facility is doing more work for you than the headline rate suggests.
The reasons here differ from ordinary lending, because the assessment is pointed at your customer rather than at you.
The debtor is not acceptable. Funders keep views on who they will take. A single overseas buyer with no UAE presence, a related party, a government body with long payment cycles that this particular funder does not cover, or a customer with its own payment record problems. Your business can be excellent and the invoice still not fundable, which means the fix is often to put forward a different debtor rather than to argue.
Concentration. If 70% of your receivables sit with one customer, the funder is effectively lending against that one company. Some will do it at a lower advance. Many will not.
The invoice is not clean. Work incomplete, delivery unsigned, a retention held back, a credit note pending, a dispute in progress. Article 16 lets your customer raise against the funder every defence and set-off it could have raised against you, so a contested invoice is worth very little to a funder no matter how good it looks on paper. Contractors holding retention should read our note on the cost of payment terms for UAE manufacturers for the arithmetic of money held back.
Somebody registered first. Covered above, and it is worth checking your own position on the register before you approach anyone.
Wrong instrument for the gap. An invoice you have issued is a receivables problem. An order you have won but cannot fund is not, and it goes to purchase order finance. Stock sitting in a warehouse is different again and belongs with inventory financing. If you are unsure whether your gap is a receivables gap at all, we compared invoice financing against working capital facilities separately.
Trade licence and shareholder documents. Six to twelve months of bank statements. VAT returns. A debtor list showing who owes what and how old it is. Copies of the invoices you want funded, with the signed delivery notes or completion certificates behind them. Your standard customer contract, so the assignment position is clear from the start. And an honest note of anything currently disputed, because it will surface anyway and it lands far better coming from you.
GrowthIQ is a UAE SME credit orchestration platform. Please note that GrowthIQ is not a capital provider. The platform enables you to connect to lenders who are most likely to approve your financing request.
For a receivables request that means one application, assessed against the written criteria of the funders on the panel, with the ones whose policy you do not meet excluded before you waste a fortnight on them, and one standardised pack rather than a fresh document hunt for each. Product fit comes first: if your gap turns out not to be a receivables gap, saying so is more useful than routing you into a facility that will be declined. The credit decision is always the funder's.
No retainer and no upfront advisory fee. A success fee applies only if financing is disbursed. For a complete application, expect typically about two to three weeks end to end.
Find out which funders your receivables fit from a single application.